Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
kryptiskt
on April 4, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
x86 Disassembly
It is quite hard to envision a scenario where the current stack frame wasn't in any cache level.
calibraxis
on April 4, 2015
[–]
Ah ok, it has something to do with caching. So the cost of `sub` can be noticeable. Thanks!
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: