It was a bogus DMCA complaint. It would have made the peoe claiming content ownership look again and either proceed with legal action or stop.
If the proceeded with legal action and it was bogus they then have pretty clearly crossed the boundaries required for the criminal element of bogus DMCA complaints.
I agree it's a frustrating and sub optimal situation.
If the proceeded with legal action and it was bogus they then have pretty clearly crossed the boundaries required for the criminal element of bogus DMCA complaints.
I agree it's a frustrating and sub optimal situation.
(Obviously I am not a lawyer).