Seriously, though, how would your library work for twitter?
It seems that the encoding process creates texts much, much larger than the original message.
One of the use cases of TweetFS is to use Twitter as a 'dead drop'. You'll generate a lot of tweets by doing that, but there's no harm done.
I don't think I hijacked your thread. The other comments also discuss textual steganography.
I was just kidding about the hijiacking comment; don't people know how to interpret emoticons anymore? :D
But this is getting a bit off-topic I suppose... :)
Seriously, though, how would your library work for twitter?
It seems that the encoding process creates texts much, much larger than the original message.