I'm really not all that interested in whatever this is. You made an objective claim about the science that is false. That's all I care about.

again you dodge providing citations for your "I wish" fever dreams about science

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7RgN9ijwE4 -- tptacek

More substance, less cheap shot uTub clips if you please.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Your own citation refutes your original claim. Why would I add another?

I don't see where any of these things you're talking about appear on this thread. I see you claiming a "strong genetic correlation" for IQ, and then presenting as your citation Richard Plomin --- look him up --- presenting a not-strong correlation. I point that out, and then you demand a citation for me. My citation is the post you provided.

This doesn't seem complicated.

>I don't see where any of these things you're talking about appear on this thread.

yes! including you providing citations to your beloved science

Why are you talking like the Wicked Witch of the West?