Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've said many times on HN that Yahoo needs to start getting REALLY aggressive in the valley to stay alive; they need to be investing in every startup that comes along and acquiring many more.

All the brain trust is being gobbled up by google and (even moreso, recently) facebook.

I personally think that Acquihires are a bad thing (TM) for the state of our industry... but if Yahoo has any hope in hell, they need to inject some innovative blood into themselves in a damn hurry.

What's the logic behind aggressive investing/acquiring, other than talent?



Check out these links regarding the logic behind acquires being much more than a talent acq.

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4325445

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4272331

Most specifically this comment I made:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4273436




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: