Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is darkly amusing to me that Paxos is still cited by people as a "good algorithm" to choose and understandable - including the cutesy island metaphor from the paper to appear approachable - and the Raft paper opens with a paragraph more or less going "ok we had a bunch of people try to understand Paxos and none of them could figure it out". Anytime I see someone recommend Paxos I silently am judging if they've actually ever read the paper or just parroting advice from when it was the only game in town.


Do you ever bother to ask whether they are recommending it for a use case other than a replicated log?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: