Honestly, is this any different from a company ninety years ago denying service to non-whites because it "could be perceived as encouraging the races to intermarry?
Yes it different, in degree, effect and legal status.
Not only that, it is extremely offensive to compare a company stopping another company using their service to download files with an evil social institution closely related to the lynching of people affected by it.
Yes it different, in degree, effect and legal status.
Not only that, it is extremely offensive to compare a company stopping another company using their service to download files with an evil social institution closely related to the lynching of people affected by it.