I'm quite interested in the outcome of this "experiment". I wish the best for the OP, but I feel like things will end poorly.
I've been a judoka for several years; I also started late, in my 30s. I train 4-5 times a week for 2+ hours a day at one of the best dojos in my country, and my country regularly medals in international events - there's no lack of high-level talent.
I've sparred with literal Olympians, and receive instruction from one of the most highly ranked and respected judoka in the world who has produced Olympic medal winning athletes, in addition to our other instructor who was a top 9 finisher in the Olympics, World Cup winner, and multi-year Pan Am champion.
And you know what I've found out after all that? Competitive judo is fucking hard. It will brutalize your mind and body in ways you never thought possible.
And just when you think you're getting anywhere, you'll have a match with someone at a national/international level, and you feel like you're a day-one white belt getting ragdolled by someone having fun and going at 40% of their competition-level intensity.
> and you feel like you're a day-one white belt getting ragdolled by someone having fun and going at 40% of their competition-level intensity.
You reminded me of a nice memory. I never trained competitively, nor very far, but was fortunate to see some people with amazing ability.
As a young teen learning Aikido, one time, our great sensei (at a local public school auditorium that was converted to a dojo in the evening) had a very high-ranking person from Japan visit. The visitor was middle-aged and jovial, and his family was also there.
At one point, the visiting sensei was demonstrating throws in the middle of the mats, and would indicate a student who was to attack. Then he'd do some subtle, conservation-of-movement whole body thing, and the student would go flying.
I received the technique myself, and the students weren't just being polite or trying to show good rolls/breakfalls -- the technique was surprisingly powerful, and you were definitely getting thrown, whether you wanted to or not. But done gently enough that you wouldn't get hurt. He would smile and maybe give a good-natured little chuckle each time.
IMO this is one of the beautiful things about Judo/BJJ. I'm bad at BJJ. I know that. Yeah I can manhandle a dude my size who's day 1 no experience. Anything more than that is me trying my best and then going easy on me. I passed that purple belts guard but he could've stopped it if he wanred to bad enough.
Then you roll with a legit seasoned black belt, and realize you are even worse than you thought.
And it's not because of the team, or the gear, or someone cheating or lag in a videogame. It's just him being better.
And you either let that beat you up, or you look forward to how high the scale goes, and keep on growing
> Then you roll with a legit seasoned black belt, and realize you are even worse than you thought.
That's pretty much the case with all sports. Try to go skiing for the first time, and compare yourself with a champion. Fighting sports are similar, but maybe we wrongly assume there's something innate with fighting. In the end, it's all technique! at least in a sport context.
One funny thing in fighting sports, is that sometimes there are big thug-looking guys joining the class, they look intimidating and dangerous, and you realize they're just as harmless as any other beginner!
Obviously me, and any other black belt, has sparred with white belts and it's like a club tennis pro playing tennis with someone coming in for the first time ever to play tennis. The gulf between beginners and pros is massive.
That being said, I always had the imposter syndrome, and always felt like I was the exacts same level as when I was a white belt.
And yes, if you have great technique, you're going to wipe the floor with someone who is a lot bigger than you are.
So, I played Judo in college. Our teacher was jokingly referred to as "Choke Monster". As you might imagine, He was really good at choking holds. He told me once that he liked demonstrating with me, because I had good natural defensive methods. He was a 3rd degree black belt at the time.
He sometimes brought black belts from his Dojo to the University class, and I loved playing with them. I got so many good learning opportunities. Even if that did mean that a 300lb black belt threw me to the ground harder than I've ever hit the mat, and then he proceeded to fall on top of me. The problem was that my natural defenses were good enough to stop his first attack attempt, but he could plan multiple attacks in sequence, and rip right from one failed attack into the next one while I was still piled up on his back. But doing so meant he had less reserve to brace over the fallen opponent, as he would normally have done.
In the end, I had a minor injury to my neck, and a separate older minor injury to my hand. And I also attended one tournament at his local Dojo, which meant that I also encountered my professors Sensei, who was a 5th degree black belt. He was also the meanest and nastiest prick I ever met, and after one encounter with that asshole, I was never going back.
It's funny, now that I think about it. That tournament is also where I was told some techniques after-the-fact that might have led me to win a match against a brown belt, who was not yet 18 and therefore we weren't technically in the same class. Our weight was about the same, but he was younger and had a lot more experience in Judo. He had also forgotten to bring his cup, so I agreed not to do certain throws.
Most of the match was him trying to throw me, and my natural defenses being good enough that he couldn't quite manage it. And then I'd try to throw him and his trained defenses were much better. And so we would kind of drag each other down onto the mat, and that latter would continue -- his trained attacks weren't quite good enough to get through my natural defenses, and my attacks were not remotely close to good enough to get through his trained defenses.
Ultimately, his training won out, because he knew of more ground attacks than I did, and he managed to get me into situations I couldn't get out of. And he did that three times in a row.
After the match, my teacher told me if I had not attempted to attack but had instead gone more defensive, I probably could have changed tack and easily walked him out of the ring, which would have automatically caused him to lose. But then we agreed that wouldn't have been a very sporting win.
Nevertheless, I was technically the winner of the heavyweight adult class in that tournament, simply by showing up. But it was fun doing a demo match with this brown belt, even though it didn't impact who won which weight class.
Unfortunately, that was the only fun thing that happened at that Dojo.
Similar experience with Brazilian Jui Jutsu. If you pick up these sports late, you fundamentally move differently from the guy that's been fighting since he was a toddler. I can tell you the second someone walks in if they have a wrestling background. Experience helps but every now and then you come across someone that's picks up more in a year than you do in 5. Just look at J Rod winning ADCC's this year as a blue belt.
Ok, so I'm not the only one who's noticed the wrestler walk? Like, something in their posture or their gait. Idk what it is, but you can just eyeball a dude and be like, "yeah he knows what a Granby roll is"
As a former wrestler now I'm wondering how I walk.
I wanted to post specifically because mentioning the Granby roll, it's one of those memories that stick out to me. I went to a camp specifically focused on it, I think in Pennsylvania, with someone who was pretty well known but I can't remember who it was. There I learned how to do a standing granby.
Many years later, in recent history, I demonstrated a side flip, all thanks to that camp.
Interesting Cedric seems to have started as a teenager, and wants to get back to it because of a regret of not doing well in nationals. This is similar to a regret I have in a tournament that I know I could have done better in.
But there's really no wrestling as an adult.
There's a lot of feelings I have wrt the article, and similarities to programming, and learning. But I'll save the wall of text.
I did judo for 5 years when I was a kid and a teenager (extremely popular in my country). Then I stopped and resumed in my late 20s for a few more years. I really loved that sport but it was too much strain on my body. Maybe I was in the wrong club, but for me it wasn't sustainable as an older adult, randoris were too intense (but the best part).
I then switched to Muay Thai which seems like a more violent sport, but it's much easier to control the intensity, as long as you're in phase with your sparring partners.
I remember the first time I got my thigh shin kicked by an ex-pro thai boxer. It was like a bomb going off in my head and I felt naseous afterwards. I could feel it days afterwards. Give me judo randori any day!
The same way a heavy weight olympic judoka could literally kill you by throwing you full force on the mat.
I trained months in Thailand, and the instructors (pros or ex-pros) were always sparring ultra light as they didn't want to get injured before their matches, and also because it's a better way to improve. In the West, some (rare) guys tend to have a bigger ego and may actually get some pride to harm beginners in sparring which is a bit ridiculous. A healthy gym will typically discourage such behaviors.
Coming back to my initial point, I feel it's easier to spar lightly in boxing than in judo.
In full contact competitive arts e.g. striking and MMA the trend has been toward more and more limitation of contact sparring. For striking and grappling arts like BJJ, you can still train skills with very low contact and low intensity drills so you could train many hours of the day sustainably. I have never practiced Judo but I am pretty sure due to the dynamic nature of throws there is no real way around throwing each other to train, i.e. the intensity or equivalent of 'contact' can only get so low.
> I'm quite interested in the outcome of this "experiment". I wish the best for the OP, but I feel like things will end poorly.
I feel like you're being a little hyperbolic. The founder of HackerNews says that he trains less than half of what this guy does, so I don't see why this guy has reason for failure any more than anyone else.
Really? I have found that like most sports it all comes down to mass and height.
Winning is an entirely different case (because resisting getting thrown too much results in points loss), but if you just want to avoid falling, just be in your upper end of your weight class, don't be short, and pay attention to footwork. You won't win any competitions this way but you won't get thrown easily during tachi-waza either.
I honestly don't even know how to respond to most of this.
You must be The Chosen One™ if all you need to do to avoid being thrown by an opponent who is more skilled than you are is "pay attention to footwork".
> just be in your upper end of your weight class
Nearly every single competitive athlete is at the upper end of their weight class. If you compete in -81kg, you're training/walking around at more or less 85kg, and cutting weight for competition. No one is showing up to the -81kg category weighing 75kg.
> don't be short
At the top level, weight classes are, effectively, height classes in disguise.
There's some variation, but the distribution of heights for a particular weight class doesn't have a very large standard deviation, especially as athletes get a little older and have packed on as much muscle as they physically can onto their frame.
> Nearly every single competitive athlete is at the upper end of their weight class
This is just not true. Lots of people gain weight in working out or training that they meet the low end and it’s stigmatized to lose a few pounds so you can be at the top of a lower weight class.
We’re talking about winning though. It’s true it’s harder to throw a guy twice your size with good footwork (there’s a white belt at my gym who comes from BJJ and did karate as a kid, nearly impossible for me to throw) but that person also isn’t likely to get you with throws if he isn’t competent (the aforementioned gentlemen is twice my size and has never thrown me or even came close.)
I did some judo back in the day. But found it demoralizing to be 'stiff-armed' by people who were just bigger and stronger (which is most people, in my case). I much preferred Japanese ju-jitsu, where you could kick or punch people who tried to stiff-arm you or stood still in randori.
I think it is quite sad that judo and taekwondo have become olympic sports. The emphasis on winning and rules has taken away far more than it has given (IMHO). Also, even as a martial arts fan, I think both are really boring to watch. Judo is mostly 2 guys trying not to move. Taekwondo is mostly 2 guys alternately bouncing up and down and hugging each other. How do you make a sport where people are trying to kick each other in the head boring? The olympics managed it.
I am not judoka, but I really enjoy watching judo matches. It looks to me like long positional game with the goal to achieve dominant position and catch sub-second opportunity window to perform explosive winning movement.
Also, I like that techniques are not brute force, but with the goal to put opponent off the balance, or find some angle for attack.
> But found it demoralizing to be 'stiff-armed' by people who were just bigger and stronger (which is most people, in my case)
Why let them get a grip? It's strategy. Bigger means higher center of gravity, which is easier to throw.
> The emphasis on winning and rules has taken away far more than it has given (IMHO).
I completely agree. The IJF has ruined the sport of competitive judo. They would rather make a new rule about something being illegal than evolve the sport.
> Loss in Judo is more personal than in other sports. Defeat in a sport like tennis feels bad, but defeat in a fighting sport is crushing in ways that most people do not comprehend.
Just this stuck out, this was one of the worst parts of high school wrestling, just two people, one on one more or less fighting. At least in football you can blame it on the team all together.
That is partly a cultural thing though, isn't it? I went to the USA as a camp counsellor in the 80s and was really stuck by the difference in attitude to winning and losing between the UK and US. In the UK it is generally considered ok to lose at sport, as long as you give it your best and conduct yourself in a sportsman-like manner. The US attitude (on my camp, at least) seemed to be to win at all costs. During the final week of sports competition at the camp, the boys would be so psyched up that the losing team would almost always burst into tears. Even the 15 year olds. Not all what you would expect in the UK.
could be, maybe depends on the sport. but I really couldn't comment on culture of the UK hah.
personally at least, i grew up playing sports with friends and losing was ok and happened, sure they were competitive though and maybe the occasional sore loser. high school sports were different for sure. probably to intense for the average kid.
However, if you're doing it for fun then getting thrown like a ragdoll is actually quite entertaining.
Even the parts that hurt are memorable in a good way. I remember someone quite expert performing a move that made my body feel like it was about to split into 4 pieces, but the pain was not that bad and only lasted for a moment (because they knew when to stop).
It is amazing (and humbling) to experience first hand what a skilled fighter can do to you in a safe context.
I lose in Randori all the time (at least every week) to the black/brown belts at my gym and it’s usually to the sound of laughter. Yea I want to win but it’s fun pulling and grip fighting and the throws are beautiful and eloquent even when it’s you getting thrown.
This is what I came to appreciate about golf as well. There's nobody to blame except yourself when things don't work out, and there's nobody else to steal credit when things go well. Even more so since there's no direct competitor/defender actively interacting with you in ways to prevent you from doing something
I think the big difference is that BJJ is meant to be used against a resisting opponent, while gymnastics is not.
You can get really good at kata by, well, doing kata, but that doesn't mean you're going to be able to employ your knife-hand block when someone's trying to punch you in the face. That drill lacks an important aspect of the actual practice.
On the other hand, if you can pull off an armbar against a guy that's really good at defending armbars, you can almost certainly pull one on a drunk guy in the Kroger's parking lot.
Gymnastics doesn't have that dynamic variable. The drill and the skill are largely the same, or the drill is at least a component of a larger skill. There's huge transfer between the two.
I originally found commoncog through hacker news and his insights on deliberate practice (and its limits) were so helpful for me, that I've been following him on twitter and reading everything he puts out.
Now, this experiment! I'm excited to learn more. I want to know more about the mental strength work and about constructing drills for softer skills.
Recently got my shodan and can relate to this article and the merits of structured practice. Judo taught me a lot about how to learn a skill as it's really pedagogically laid out by Kano. The method for learning is spelt out in such a way that if you repeat the process then apply what you've learned during randori, you will improve.
It’s interesting to think about what “atomic drills” would look like for programming. I do “dojos” with my team but it’s usually more “group code review” or “present interesting concept”.
I’ve heard folks do mob programming on simple problems (eg “implement fizzbuzz in a few different paradigms”). Perhaps also a little time spent on advent of code would be good too? Everybody on the team does Day X and then we discuss and compare solutions?
Edit to add: thinking about drills - what if we merged interviews and team drills, spent some time setting up a realistic work scenario as a drill, and added an interviewee? That way, during an interview the team gets to drill, say, reviewing and debugging a feature rollout. The interviewee gets to actually spend 2-4h in a realistic work simulation instead of solving LeetCode problems.
"Atomic drills", as done for sports, do not apply well to programming IME. The following will make a lot more sense if you are familiar with the book Thinking Fast and Slow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow), or the research upon which that popularization is based.
Atomic drills as performed for sports allow you to use System 2 (slow, deliberate, logical) to train System 1 (fast, reactive, emotional). But when programming you are almost always going to be in System 2. Programming does not deal with instantaneous reactions in the same way sports does. Sure, you might react to a bug report (dammit, Johnson, I told you async was a bad idea for this!) but its not like sports, where by the time you consciously process input your physical reaction should have already occurred. To take the example from the Judo article, if you have formed the thought of "that guy looks about to throw me!" you are probably already on the ground.
There may be very time limited, competitive programming events where you need to think so fast that atomic drills can come into play. I do not know of any but they could exist.
But basically, when programming, at least on a professional basis, you are not relying on physical reactions to get the job done. And atomic drills are about training physical reactions.
There is definitely value, lots of it, to the "realistic work scenarios" you describe, it is just not the same as figuring out the bare fundamentals of a sport and practicing until they are entirely subconscious.
Aren't things like LeetCode and Hacker Rank supposed to be programming drills? Though I do like the idea of getting a realistic work simulation. That said isn't 4 hours a little short? I wouldn't be able to get much of anything done in so little time.
That sounds like a good principle in managing oneself too. Work in feedback for every mini-milestone into your work rhythm.
Training the subconscious to do (automatically know what to do next, want to do it, get on it) is the self-management goal.
Do something measurable, and arrange things to experience some meaningful response to any milestone.
I may be doing this when I design and code in different rooms of my house. Obviously speed isn't the main point of either task. But my subconscious definitely registers "I completed an actionable part of the design" as I move from living room to my study to code. And vice versa.
Helps that this mini-milestone context-switching "feedback" is a natural part of doing the work. Part of the flow.
I've been a judoka for several years; I also started late, in my 30s. I train 4-5 times a week for 2+ hours a day at one of the best dojos in my country, and my country regularly medals in international events - there's no lack of high-level talent.
I've sparred with literal Olympians, and receive instruction from one of the most highly ranked and respected judoka in the world who has produced Olympic medal winning athletes, in addition to our other instructor who was a top 9 finisher in the Olympics, World Cup winner, and multi-year Pan Am champion.
And you know what I've found out after all that? Competitive judo is fucking hard. It will brutalize your mind and body in ways you never thought possible.
And just when you think you're getting anywhere, you'll have a match with someone at a national/international level, and you feel like you're a day-one white belt getting ragdolled by someone having fun and going at 40% of their competition-level intensity.