Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

aw man, you're gonna force me to read this? fuck. ok. give me a minute.

...

Okay, I think that as expected the word salad doesn't do anything to expand on the subject; it's another grossly compact attempt at telling everyone what a crazy and interesting life he's had without going into detail beyond the barest mention that he was somewhere and talked to someone; serves yet again as a form of name-dropping; proves absolutely nothing about debate but somehow oddly inspires people here to go way out of their way debating what the author meant.

In general? I think debate is just a byword for civil discussion, and the concept of winning or losing one is stupid. Discussions are meant to elucidate and digress and open both people to one another's point of view, but that's no reason they shouldn't be contentious. To describe a contentious conversation as a debate in which someone has to win and someone has to lose is reductive and misses the point of conversation. To cast oneself as the ultimate martyr in such conversations by way of [losing one's ego on the road from Patpong to Nepal and] creating ranking click bait topics is pure Derek Sivers. There ya go.



Thank you for that. I appreciate your conversation about the content of his article rather than the content of his character.

Like others, I have no idea who Sivers is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: