Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> SBF has used at least one cpu attached to a network on the critical path of his actions.

I've read that sentence of yours at least 5 times now and it still makes no sense to me. Would you care to elucidate?



OP was using "cpu attached to a network" to mean "computer" and "critical path of his actions" as something like "business model".

he's saying that politicians, journalists, regulators, etc, got bamboozled by what was at root a very ordinary fraud, because it was enabled by fancy technology.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: