Dear fellow HN citizens,
A friend of mine and me were taking part in a Hackathon that was lasting 48 hours. The theme was "open source" and we had to implement all products from scratch, as instructed by the organizers.
Later, we found out that multiple companies have hijacked this Hackathon and were selling their established products and even legal company entities as an idea that was supposedly created during that time frame. They even had company websites where the exact same product was marketed years before the Hackathon.
None of those "commercial" participants interacted with anyone on the Hackathon, and were just there with single members to pitch their established products and businesses.
We won the 3rd place, but said companies got the 1st and 2nd place. So, our question is now an ethical one:
Would you accept the prize money?
If yes, do you have suggestions what kind of Open Source project to sponsor with it? (We don't want to keep the money)
From our perspective we feel like an obligatory winner, and we think that this was very unfair to all other (non-commercial) participants of the Hackathon that were putting much work and faith into the spirit of the competition.
The incentives make sense for commercial companies to participate to gain exposure, and the organizers probably don't mind if it boosts their attendance (although it can, as you've observed, reduce the sense of authenticity for some participants - even award-winners like yourselves).
Choosing a project to sponsor with the winnings is a tricky question. What kind of properties would you look for in an honest, enabling open source project? (disclaimer / notice: I both work in the area of open source software, and have a (free and) open source project, and I wouldn't make any request for your money in either of those contexts -- I'm not indirectly fishing for anything)
For some reason your comment made me think of the film "They Live" (very tongue-in-cheek) which you might enjoy, if you haven't seen it already.