I think everybody knew he would walk on the murder charges before the trial even started. One of the charges against him is a weapons charge that he is most certainly going to be found guilty of.
Section (3)(c):
948.60(3)(c)
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
941.28 relates to NFA controlled SBRs.
29.304 and 29.593 are specific to those involved in hunting.
Oh no, I have seen a lot of people on social media who have completely fallen for the misinformation around this case who are completely convinced he is guilty of murder and being found not guilty would be due entirely to white supremacists on the jury or the bench or some other conspiracy theory about the police or prosecutors involved in the case.
They have become completely divorced from reality and not even linking and quoting statutes and case law or footage and transcripts from this trial or photo and video evidence from this case changes their mind. They've been literally brainwashed into not believing their lying eyes, it's like flat earthers and anti vaxers. It's really scary how effective this branwashing is and how so many gullible people fall for it :(