>It’s just simple arithmetic, however you want to subsidize or socialize the cost, the fact is that renewables have higher cost per MW.
All the more reason for a carbon price. If the cost from renewables is genuinely more expensive than climate destabilization, then make the price explicit and the market will sort the practical from the pointless.
If there's one thing markets are good at, it's choosing the cheaper option. But they need a price signal to work on in the first place.
All the more reason for a carbon price. If the cost from renewables is genuinely more expensive than climate destabilization, then make the price explicit and the market will sort the practical from the pointless.
If there's one thing markets are good at, it's choosing the cheaper option. But they need a price signal to work on in the first place.