Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"only those with children could vote" implies removing the right to vote from people without children, which has nothing to do with compulsory voting.


Yes? That was the point I was making, you don’t necessarily want universal suffrage. Those with long-term interest are better for society


That didn't sound like the point you were making, and others agree with me. Everyone is responding to you thinking that you were criticizing mandatory or compulsory voting, not universal suffrage. Your choice of words "forced to vote" rather than "right to vote" conveyed that meaning.


Forcing people to vote is universal suffrage on steroids. I don’t think universal suffrage is good be default (it might be idk), but I think forcing the vote takes the worst parts of universal suffrage, uninformed and/or indifferent population voting, and over samples that group




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: