I'm pretty sure Berne Convention says nothing about the act of downloading. Your use of "akin" may be incorrect. Of course, different counties have different laws, but if we try to infer legality or illegality of downloading purely from Berne Convention, I'd like to ask this question: how can you make a copy of something that you don't have the original in the first place? Thus, it's more likely that the party who's distributing the work is making a copy, not the downloader.

Isn't it the server that makes the copy? You don't have anything, so how could you be copying it?

You have the copy your hard disk writes.

You have the copy that the server has transmitted to you, but the server still made the copy.

You said 'You don't have anything'

Which is false. You have the copy your hard disk wrote.

I said nothing of the sort. Look back at who posted which comments. You responded to my only post in this thread.

You're right, I was talking to jrockway. Not really sure why you entered the conversation.

What about in the US? Can one be tracked/prosecuted simply for downloading?

Theoretically yes but usually they target distributors in preference to users. It's easier to get a verdict or judgment against the distributor because it avoids the question of "what is a copy" and how that applies to the digital space and also because people are less sympathetic to distributors. The thing with P2P applications is that everyone is also automatically a distributor.

Yes, it happens with other copywritten materials frequently.

Without a doubt. Remember the Anonymous guys arrested by doing DDoS: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/01/two-real-gun...