Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some of the bar plots seem misleading because of the scaling. The monthly one, for example, almost made me believe that January is half as productive as October. The "zero" level is not stated anywhere, but the lowest value is still halfway to the top.

This feels like intentional exaggeration to me. If the lowest value started at the base line, like they do e.g. in currency exchange plots, there would be no doubt about offset. This way, the initial impulse is to compare areas of the bars.



Your comment made me curious so I redid the plots with three different axes.

The first one starts from 5.5 which makes it look nearly identical to that in the blog post

https://i.imgur.com/n0LZJd8.png

The second one is where I let the y-axis run from 0 to 10 instead of from 5.5 to 10. In my opinion, this changes very little

https://i.imgur.com/cmrnbDp.png

The third one is with the y-axis from 0 to 100 which makes the effect significantly less pronounceable

https://i.imgur.com/pk9Bs9n.png

Matlab code:

    m = 1:12;
    tasks = [7.2 7.6 8.3 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.8 9.5 9.0 8.0];
    bar(m,tasks);

    % axis([0 12.5 0 100]);
    % axis([0 12.5 0 10]);
    axis([0 12.5 5.5 10]);

    title('In which month do people complete most tasks');
    xlabel('Month');
    ylabel('Percentage people reporting completing most tasks');




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: