Because it's the right thing to do in this case? If you define what you want to defend purely based on what a law you don't agree with can be used to do, as opposed to the merits of the actual instance, you're bound to pick a bunch of really bad battles.
Because it's the right thing to do in this case? If you define what you want to defend purely based on what a law you don't agree with can be used to do, as opposed to the merits of the actual instance, you're bound to pick a bunch of really bad battles.