Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wormpilled's commentslogin

This reads more like intelligence community PR. The whole "hardened spy who just wanted to grill hotdogs" narrative is almost too perfect. It plays right into the USA ego. The narcissistic idea that everyone secretly just wants the suburban lifestyle.

It's really hurting the brand. I can't remember the last time I bothered to even check that index. I used to check it all the time.


/newest is pretty grim, too. Go there and click any link, and odds are you won't even need to read the contents to know it's AI generated, because you'll immediately be met by one of:

- A landing page that looks exactly like every single AI generated landing page ever, I don't even need to describe it, you already know what it looks like

- An article or blog post headered by an image with the Gemini logo in the corner

- A Github repository with CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md and/or 50 large commits made in the span of a day

I'd estimate that more than half of new submissions now fall into one of the above categories.


There's almost no shot to get hand authored posts some views (I tried with one of mine recently). I felt like I submitted it and a moment later there were like 20 new very obviously AI generated posts ahead of it.


I recently had the same experience with a Show HN thread I posted.


I think that's a different category, though. Those backgrounds are actual video recordings of real places, not 3D environments modeled from scratch. It looks 'real' because the background actually exists.


It's still 100% CGI compositing and definitely not all of them are real places or real objects.

In that specific 15 year old example they're mostly composited, you're right about that.


I love Ian Hubert's demos of green screening in Blender.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxD6H3ri8RI

His Blender Conference talk about photogrammetry / camera projection / projection mapping was fantastic:

World Building in Blender - Ian Hubert

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whPWKecazgM


Computer Generated Imagery.


IDK what's funnier/more pathetic, them doing this or an entire article getting written about it.

MicroslopSlop


> them doing this

Wouldn't any community that wants to encourage good quality conversations immediately ban everyone posting stupid slashdot-esque jokes like this?


You can't build a community if you ban everything except soulless corporate dronespeak. Nobody would ever be interested in joining it without getting paid for it. That's a business meeting, not a community.


Yeah that's what LinkedIn in is for. If they just want people or bots to just fawn over everything they put out. I'm glad M$ is getting called out for the slip they put out.


Do you think r/credibledefense/ is like LinkedIn?

I think there's a big difference between having high standards and the slop that is LinkedIn.


Banning slashdot-esque nonsense is not banning "everything except soulless corporate dronespeak"


But if they want to get rid of "slashdot-esque nonsense", they should behave in a way that doesn't encourage it. The fact that the jokes are cringe and played-out is beside the point; this isn't going to change anyone's attitude.


> But if they want to get rid of "slashdot-esque nonsense", they should behave in a way that doesn't encourage it.

Sure, and their mistake here was 100% the fact that they chose to host this chat on Discord, home to the cringiest crowd on the internet.


Given that nobody else banned it we can now blame Microsoft for taking down the only decent online community. Now we are stuck on hackernews and its ilk.


Decent communities that strive for a high standard of conversation like r/credibledefense/ will immediately ban you for posting such nonsense.

Go look and tell me that's not one of the best curated communities on the internet, despite specifically covering incredibly controversial topics. HN is good but doesn't even come close.


> r/credibledefense/

The rules they enforce on normal posts are so strict that they have to create daily "mega" threads with less stringend rules just to keep the sub on life support. A+ moderation, clearly a healthy and well managed community.


On life support with those "mega" threads getting 1000+ comments a day?

The split works very well, the megathreads mostly stick to tracking rapidly developing situations in which separate threads would just be spammy and unnecessarily fragment the conversation


...the AI agent sock-puppets pushing false positive narratives about MicroslopSlopSlop, and trolling anyone that disagrees =3

"Bad Bot Problem" (Computerphile)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjQNDCYL5Rg


That's a pretty big aside


I just press ctrl+alt+R to activate reader mode in Firefox and copy the entire page. Takes 3 seconds.


That doesn't work (well) on many sites: X/Twitter, walled articles/fora, and pages with heavy JS rendering. I just wanted something that Just Works™ which is why I built this.


Thank you, seeing that Instagram video linked in the article is a great detail a lot of people are missing because they won't look past the paywall.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBMh48KvHYz/

It is utterly pathetic.


Wow, just wow. Please don't kink-shame.


>Wait... So because I chose a life of not struggling to raise a child and I love my dog; I'm pathetic?

It's brutal to say such things and certainly to hear them, but objectively, yes.


This is one of those cases where the people who are most assertive about Doing X (in this case X = having kids) are specifically the types of people you do not want Doing X.

Just unbelievable levels of self-aggrandizement and scorn for your fellow humans in this comment. It is honestly a shame that you could propagate this forward another generation.

Having kids is good. Calling people "pathetic" for not wanting to or not feeling like they would succeed at it is bad and counterproductive.


I am simply providing a cold, social darwinist answer to the query. It doesn't bring me pleasure to say it, but I view it as the truth. Life is struggle. Nothing you do will be perfect. None of us were grown in a vat and we are here right now because of that struggle. Finding comfort in an animal that gives you unconditional love is a coping mechanism.


Kids are the same coping mechanism. After a generation or two, you’ll long be forgotten. Don’t believe me? Tell me something that matters about your great grandparents.

Avoid unnecessary or unwanted struggle, leave those who choose it to it, it is theirs to own and bear.


My grandparents had my parents. My parents had me. I had my children. Hopefully they will have theirs.

Even if we can't remember, we know they were there. They succeeded in carrying on the species. We can wonder about them and what their lives were like.

"Lo, now, do I see my fathers and my fathers' fathers back to the beginning!"

"I go now to join my fathers, in whose mighty company I shall no longer feel ashamed."


If you’re happy to pay ~$380k per kid (not including daycare and college) over their 0-18 journey (£250k-£300k in the UK) and whatever it costs to help them survive in adulthood for the experience, help yourself. That’s certainly a choice. The future will not be as welcoming and prosperous as the past.


Only childless people will bring forward such a calculation of costs. And this shows that it‘s a great thing they remain childless.


This is so logically full of holes I don't even know where to start...

Having children is hard. Life is hard. Avoiding having children is shirking your duty to have a hard life. Dogs shouldn't make you happy because that is coping with life's hardships. Having children, which is hard, is the path one should take to wantonly endure hardship. If you choose not to, you are pathetic...

What if I didn't have a dog or cat, and still chose not to have children? Still pathetic? What if I had children, and hated every minute of it, but fulfilled my duty to endure the hardship... AND still had a dog I love? What if I really really enjoy lemonade - should I avoid that because it brings me joy, but life is inherently supposed to be hard, therefore I am coping and pathetic?

This is such a mind-boggling judgmental stance on what life is and should be and what others should do with their agency over their own lives.

As I said to the wantonly miserable OP who started this bizarre comment thread - godspeed to you! I'd wish you a nice life, but I don't want to go against your philosophy that one should invite hardship into one's life, so... Have a miserable life?


>on what life is

Life is procreation, to which you are encouraging failure in it's goal. I don't care what you do, I'm just sharing hard to swallow pills.


The things we say, do, and create have far more of a chance of affecting future generations than our progeny.


> If I, as a straight white male, started a men’s club, excluded women, and conducted my company’s business there, I would (rightfully) be exposed to a claim of discrimination.

No you wouldn't that's not how it works.


I’ll let my mom know - she successfully sued an employer for doing just that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: