None of this is an issue, the real issue is webpages not working in safari due to large part of the web being made exclusively for chromium.

Interesting, I wouldn’t think it matters that much though. If the phrase eating dogfood is unappetising to some when why not use the champagne analogy.

because you lose the meaning over time. Emotional aspects of language can be useful.

George Carlin's famous piece on it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o25I2fzFGoY

I doubt this is about the asterisks at this point. It’s about Rust, rewriting working tools in Rust and showing that Rust is the way and the only way.

Must’ve been hard not to name it rusdo because Rust has to come first (before any logic).

Exactly, too many times have i heard from some snob not to rub them, who later had to pull a splinter out of their finger.

As shown by Altman, not really.

Exactly, paying for quality content should be normalised. Even a trivial amount - 10-50c. And the reality is that it is unheard of.

I would gladly pay a few cents to read an article. Isn't the problem that no one figured out the business or technical model to accomplish that? I think I remember reading, 10 years ago, that bitcoin would solve that problem.

Well, the largest ad tech company on the planet owning the largest platform to view content on (Chrome) certainly may or may not have something to do with the viability of alternative payment models.

The mental transaction cost is the hard part. The effort required to decide whether to pay at all is significant enough that payments don't scale down to the micro- level.

Awesome it’s hosted on codeberg too

There is a growing view of “healthy” approach to AI: Llm-assisted coding instead of vibing, using it for grammar and better language instead of letting it write the whole paper, starting off and getting a template instead of end to end AI.

Having AI write the homework/report/paper is considered plagiarism. It’s really easy to profs to check it because people who do it usually don’t even bother reading their own slop. It’s obvious nonsense and they can’t answer a basic question about their own work.

With coding it’s obviously harder, but the same works - asking “what does this part of code do” is very effective.

With the last part the real problem is lazy profs. Most don’t want to be bothered with ever talking to students, checking assignments, tutoring. If they could some of them would only do final exams.

One seems to be completely empty and the remaining two seem to just be ideas for pro-ai and anti-ai respectively?