Hard to say other than usually the feed is tailored to the user's interests, or so they say ;)

exactly. Its stunning it has to be like this.

I think you're talking past each other. You're talking of capabilities, GP is talking about complexity.

Not only that, but unfiltered, unedited LLM responses to the comments.

shudder, I'd rather talk to the LLM directly than to this wetware shell :)

You didn't even provide the exact model you pulled that out!

"Seems plausible".... Can you please read up about the ways LLM generate their output?

It's a solved problem with a slightly flawed implementation on the end devices.

You seem to be arguing that introducing the whole new class of legal frameworks, technical requirements and privacy scandals(1)(2) is somewhat better than fixing the end user software flaws.

(1) https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/1-billion-identity-rec... (2) https://proton.me/blog/discord-age-verfication-breach

I am not arguing for that at all!

I specifically said that I don't think age verification laws are a solution.

But I also don't think it is a solved problem, and think that parents need better tools to help protect their children online.

It can't be done unless you have deeper pockets and access to media controlling the hard of thinking.

Incorrect!

There is an enormous amount of policy that doesn't require significant money to oppose this in your local jurisdictions! This is one of them.

You're saying that because you fell for the scam. Seriously, every "think of the children" initiative is a scam.

And especially for that one it was quite obvious lawmakers were purchased to introduce these laws.

And there are receipts, too: https://codeberg.org/svin/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings

Out of these two he is DEFINITELY not a Democrat, and the current MAGA-flavoured Republican regime supports him across the board so......

And it's quite clear he doesn't support democracy in any way possible.

I'm just curious - did you see that I also wrote the top-level comment strongly condemning Grump, that brought out the crazies in the first place? I didn't intend the follow up comment be be taken as a hyper-literal statement of facts, and it feels like that directionality should have been clear from context.

They're unwilling modern battlefield tactics tester and actually losing the Ukraine to Russia would be a pretty big blow to the Europe and to the lesser extent to NATO.

Its not like the rest of the world is not getting anything from Ukrainians standing up to the genocidal KGB* apparatchik.

*yes, i know, FSB. Same organisation really.

It was KGB in his early career, so KGB works, too.