Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rvnx's commentslogin

This shows the failure of human reviews alone, an LLM-based reviewer would have caught it. Both approaches are complementary

The best solution is through education. For example by showing in big letters the return-to-player ratio:

On 100 EUR you will get → 79 back, if you put them again in the machine you will get → 62.41 → 49.30 → 38.95 → 30.77…


Just trying to get normies to understand that slot machines aren't "hot" and "due" for a jackpot because nobody has won recently is virtually impossible. Stats class is hard and people don't really trust what they've learned anyway. A huge portion of the public even believes in such a thing as a person having "good luck". It's nonsensical, tantamount to believing the god of fortune is going to intercede on your behalf, but people really do think this way.

There are bots here too, lot of them, to a point that rules were amended, this is because it's very valuable to give points to new publications

Pretty sure the solution that US politicians will find will be to create new dollars out of thin air, so instead of increasing taxes they increase the money supply.

Of course this is going to increase prices, but then they can blame China / Russia / Iran whoever is the scapegoat at that time.


That’s a tax on the poor

It would cause inflation, isn’t that sort of a tax on people who have more wealth than income? (Which includes people like retirees, so, I’m not saying this is a universally good thing).

> isn’t that sort of a tax on people who have more wealth

Classically, yes, particularly when that wealth is closer to productive capital. In modern economies, the rich also hold a lot of debt, which lets them benefit from inflation.


Theoretically yes, but in practice the wages of people already not making much have not tracked inflation and there's no reason to believe that they will now. That means any inflation is also a tax on them.

Isn’t it the opposite? Salaries are sticky while asset prices rise freely with the liquidity of the market for them

No because assets hold their worth. Poor people have no assets

Poor people are hit a lot harder, but rich still have to pay capital gains on inflation even despite having no real change in value. So the rich pay inflation at the rate * 0.2. Poor pay it at the rate * 1.0 (5x the rate of the rich).

> rich still have to pay capital gains on inflation

“Pay” is doing a lot of work there. My house is half equity half debt. The debt gets to be paid off with inflated dollars. And I pay no capital gains on the appreciation. I can, however, tap it for liquidity if I need it.


Rich people don't tend to have a sizeable portion of their worth tied up in their primary residence (and even then, IIRC there is a cap on capital gains exception), otherwise property tax would turn into a wealth tax for them which obviously they want to avoid. Non-primary residences still require paying capital gains. The inflated value you paid off with debt for a non-primary residence still gets captured as capital gain in the end when you actually want to sell the house for money.

You're right, thanks.

A big part of the responsibility lays on software and hardware companies like Google or Apple that implement (or allow) support for these DRMs.

They could perfectly refuse them, and de-facto DRMs would be marginalized, to a point it would not even be an option.


Oh, definitely. They could put the foot down and end this pointless charade swiftly. But if Google and Apple had the balls to go against the big media, the world would look very differently.

They are, in fact, the big media themselves now. They have the power, and more than enough of it. No streaming service can afford to skip having an app on iOS or Android - all Apple has to do is crack the whip. Say "this DRM is no longer compliant with our device policy and will be phased out by 2030" and there goes that.

But they still act like they're weird web teens who can't raise a voice against the big media boys without getting bullied for it.

That, or they believe this DRM charade serves them - and user experience can go suck a dick.


> That, or they believe this DRM charade serves them - and user experience can go suck a dick.

I'd go for this option, the duopoly think it could be an extra barrier which can help them to prevent future competition.


FYI Samsung was paid by MS to add DRM to the Galaxy devices ~2010. Source: I was part of the team that had to implement the customer-facing part, carrier billing integration and backend 4-way revshare accounting in zero time. Harder than it sounds, and probably never repeated since unless you're preloading it's against terms to introduce payments on Android. IIRC the real heroes were the Indian embedded engineers who were 10x better than the Koreans.

2026: Apple chose the tip of a penis as a mascot.

Say hello to your new companion!

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5e949a92e17d55...


Still much better than Amazon's Peccy. Even the name is suspect.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90329525/amazon-peccy


If you see penis everywhere that's on you, unfortunately.


Fitting as Apple have been a complete bell end lately.

The Phinder Phallus if you will.

Not the first time something Apple did was slightly phallic --- OS X El Capitan (now 10 years ago!) had a slightly unfortunate slogan:

https://techcrunch.com/2016/02/25/more-to-love-with-every-di...

As an aside, your link leads to an image/webp served with a .jpeg extension. WTF?


More


If tomorrow Claude pricing changes and they start charging real API costs like 2000+ USD, and there is another service: "NotReallyClaude" that is a bit less good but 200 USD, then what would you do ?


Welcome to Claude Code;

200 USD at Claude, versus 3000 USD (literally) at Gemini. Well, then it will be Claude.

If tomorrow Claude is 5000 USD, well, then it will be Gemini.


Replace "claude code" with "fentanyl" and reread.

This is what is called the drug dealer tactic. Once you need AI they will all cartel and you will pay half your salary (or your boss does) for it.


I have no idea what your sentence means (as a non-English native) but I feel you.

Such a waste of burnt money that could be used for more useful projects.


It's a short book giving obvious advice, that one needs to embrace change, using a metaphor of mice and cheese. It receives a lot of scorn for that, despite many needing to hear the message.

I'm ready to embrace change, however in this case no one cares. The cheese hasn't just been moved, it has been taken to another planet where us mice are not allowed to go.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: