If those numbers are true, they could tart with one Mac and can double every few months. But, I guess there are also many people who do not have ready access to whatever a Mac mini costs either...

You can run the simulation out, but if the idea works, you can get to scaled revenue much faster than organic growth keeping 100% of the margin.

This is essentially the same reason even the best money managers take outside money to start, even if they eventually kick out the investors.

It's not just you. I started coding in the 80s. Never heard of Oberon.

I am using BoringNotch, which is great. Is this somehow related?

No , boring notch is a Dynamic Island like utility and it also hasn’t been updated since November , I suggest you to try out atoll which is a fork of it and pretty great .

Thank you for the tip! I love boring notch but it does have a few bugs and indeed hasn't been updated in a long time. I will check out atoll!

I think this correct it’s mediocre at a lot. It’s only 10x when you don’t know what you’re doing or doing something simple.

It's also more often than not good enough, which for a specialist is bad, and for most everyone else is absolutely sufficient.

I don't necessarily agree with that... I think that it's a matter of perspective. I find that AI tends to make a lot of the same errors I've seen from actual developers, especially when interacting or leading foreign dev teams.

When I spend a lot of time in planning mode, I tend to get a lot more value out of the output and have to redirect far less. It also helps to establish your API interfaces, reference points, interactions, behaviors and even a lot of the test harnesses ahead of development cycles. You need to define a lot more ahead of letting it go.

I would say that I'm getting maybe 2.5x the value and 5-10x the output from AI... by value, I mean what the end user/customer cares about... by 5-10x I'm including the increased documentation, testing, etc.

I think the point is that he doesn’t want the kid to die in a fire.

Neither did all those middle eastern dads targeted by OpenAI-powered kill chains.

You might be Aussietistic?

For Germans you would use the ICD-11, not the DSM-5-TR.

1&2 just pick one, it doesn’t matter. 3 mostly you’re the parser… if you’re after accuracy there are better versions, but it sure is simple to read and write

Agree. While it is common to see code like these pandas examples, it is very possible to write these manipulations so that they return a new frame or view without changing the inputs.

Now get a third opinion, and marvel at all the thinking that you have accomplished

In my experience the last answer it gives is usually the right one

Ah, so the trick is to figure out which one will be the last answer. The halting problem....

It’s always the last place you look