Nice. Its interesting to me that searching and filtering isnt something that http://csvbase.com has.

I looked at that too for my use case. It was super cool, but I needed something to utilize a CSV that I did not have to initially upload through webui, and also wanted it to be downloadable, so this hit those checkboxes for me.

Honestly I cant really imagine a world with unlimited time and money - it would be so different from the present world that has shaped us all. But that aside, I would work on assembling a team that could build and support a widely available tricorder.

It looks great - nice work. I tried the french example and found it challenging and useful - a great addition to my duo lingo practice. So much so that I signed up. But in doing so I lost the credits that Id apparently acquired by completing the example which was a little disappointing. I hadnt seen the Easy French videos before - they look nice too.

I cant explain the similarity of my comment to others around the same time. My reaction was a quick yay! to what I thought was a sane take on the capabilities and limitations of LLMS.

Great article that contains some pithy aphorisms that I expect to see again and again.

hackmd but branded for science and with a monetisation angle - that's cool. You are missing terms and privacy - I need to know who Im trusting and where Im operating before I sign up to something like this. These are the most concise I know of: https://simplenote.com/terms/

Hey, thanks for the feedback. I know this is something I need. I've just been reluctant to do it because I want to hire a lawyer and get it done right, but not before validating that people actually want to use the platform. I'll probably put a stop-gap in place this week. In general, I plan on being pretty author-friendly, as I'm an author and I wouldn't want someone else controlling my content / data.

Your strategy was proposed by joel spolsky some time ago: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2008/09/11/password-managemen...

Is it good hygiene to delete these records once they've served their purpose (i.e. validating control of the domain in question)? Or do these records server more than that use?

Some services do periodic re-checks of the record and un-verify the domain if the record was removed.

As they should. If a domain name changes hands, the previous owner should have its ownership verification revoked.

But the new owner could just duplicate the entries, to avoid that you have to periodically revalidate with a new entry.

I think it's more about the opposite. If you are the new owner, you don't want the old owner to continue to have access to features connected to your new domain.

So as a new owner you would want to remove the tokens.

Intriguing, hadn't considered that way round!. spf especially is something you'd have to update

Presumably services pay attention to the TTL, so services don't have to constantly refresh.

There should be a mechanism to have the validating party revoke the code they gave you. (Right?)

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC data lives in TXT records that must stay there forever; otherwise, you'll have problems delivering your email.

Its a talk at a programming languages conference by a programming languages professor who moved into medicine to help diagnose and treat his son with a genetic condition. Its a great talk which simultaneously provides an introduction to biomedical research and knowledge based systems and provides some compelling cases for the benefit of combining the two. It also takes you through a journey that includes starting a company, working with the white house and being recruited to be the director of a university research institute.

Good find. Im loving that the README of this project includes a Rick Roll