Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | labradore's commentslogin

Just like functional programming itself, if you keep your hiring within some practical boundaries, you'll not go far wrong.


The thing about the "money" argument is that one could just as strongly claim that you went to 1st grade "for money".


except that there is a certain lack of autonomy both legally, mentally, and physically that prevents first grade aged children from refusing to go to school in many nations.

In other words : you can't derive a motivation from an action an individual does if it's something that they're forced to do so socially or legally.


And at the end, we end up with the capitalists dream: "I was born... for money"


I was born into debt. Then, I was forced to go to schools that taught obedience to authority, getting a job, and paying taxes. Then, I saw ads that told me I needed to buy products and run up debt. Then, I eventually didn't care about money except where absolutely necessary.

Everything in between made it seem like making money my No. 1 focus was necessary, though. A lifetime of being manipulated and pressured. It all gets better when you can finally pull back the curtain seeing what's really there. :)


They like to use small teams. I wouldn't be surprised if their least-used AWS product is still profitable (aside from brand-new stuff or obvious non-profits like Deep Racer). The idea is to get people into AWS and help keep them there. You don't do that by making life harder or unpredictable for your customers.


Does it seriously take 10k people to make Alexa? And she's way dumber than Google. Yes, they should be cutting some costs.


Maybe it's one of those many-if-statements style AIs.


We prefer to call them decision trees. It sounds far fancier.


For what it's worth, ConnectWise is also owned by private equity (Thoma Bravo). TB seems to be supporting the growth of the company.


My current employer was formerly owned by Thoma Bravo. They "supported growth" on the surface. Under that veneer was really juicing up the company to make us more attractive for their exit - short term decisions that have resulted in a lot of employee burnout and have put us in a bad place under our new ownership.

I hope to not have to work for a PE-owned company in the future, as their goals (to position for their exit, usually 3-5 years after initial purchase) often result in short-term oriented choices that hurt a company's long term potential


So the quarterly goals of public companies are better? Many companies sell to sponsors in order to be able to make long term strategic decisions.


> TB seems to be supporting the growth of the company.

PE "support growth" for forcing loans on the company with expectation they'll be paid back, which makes the company operate very differently than a VC-backed growth startup.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: