Added to toptext. Thanks!

Both Excalidraw and TLDraw are the two most popular apps of their kind, simplistic whiteboard tools, so I don't think it's that surprising and I don't see any reason why this post should be a "Show HN".

TLDraw: https://www.tldraw.com/

Excalidraw: https://excalidraw.com/

For me, draw.io is still the winner, and especially now that it runs locally also on Linux. As for works in progress, I hope this one succeeds (and would also run locally at some point):

TikzMaker: https://tikzmaker.com/

Whatever the reason for the inclusion was here, the general problem is much bigger. People / companies / products can influence the direction of AI answers to put them in a better light and to be recommended more often. This isn't limited to just products even.

If not on the surface, we’re all deep down aware that an initial era of an advertising-free new technology is once again almost over.

See you on neural links before “sponsored thoughts”.

It's already over, the problem is the missing transparency. With an LLM you have no idea what influenced the answer, and there is no good way to show it to the user.

What does AI have to do with it?

The video: https://youtu.be/OT_iyvOy0Tk

Of course they are advertising their own new USB cable, but as someone who didn't know much about USB cables I find it quite interesting.

Some more context as someone living in Korea right now, "cheap" cars in Korea are quite rare, especially in Seoul. Having a car is somewhat of a luxury and not needed for daily life. So I think this is trying to move some of the cost of clean energy towards those who can afford it.

> Having a car is somewhat of a luxury

That's true in many other places, too, like many European and US coastal cities where car ownership rates aren't nearly as high as many people probably think they are.

I wouldn't call it luxury. It's just that people don't find it attractive while living in Seoul. Average joe definitely can afford having a car.

"An advanced city is not one where even the poor use cars, but rather one where even the rich use public transport."

Does Korea also not allow Chinese cars?

Usually the luxury part is not the price of the car, it's the associated costs, especially parking. Coupled to the fact that you don't actually need the car (and it's probably a hassle for day to day life, so you only use it for the rare out of town trips).

They are allowed.

So we should expect Kia and Hyundai cars to get really good soon, if they have direct competition undercutting them like that.

Interesting idea, wondering if the 4 bars are a good way to evaluate accounts.

Some more thoughts:

1. The website needs a description of what this project even is.

2. Open-source the code, especially since it's just for the community, I'd be vary of installing "some random" extension from the store.

3. The modal element in the iFrame on the website is cutoff on mobile widths using Firefox.

You can get the main content of a page as markdown via something like https://defuddle.md/

I sometimes read things via Feeder (the Android app) and there I can also pull in some content, even things that aren't included in the original RSS.

Any plans on possibly making the notes be local markdown files similar to how Obsidian does it?

Yeah I will add Markdown support. Added to the roadmap :)

I think especially for websites / web apps you'd want to start with a "mobile first" design, as is common in web design.

It's almost always easier to go from lower widths to large widths than the other way around for good responsive designs. This, and 1000px being an arbitrary number, doesn't give me confidence.

I disagree with mobile first design in general. Some apps are meant to be desktop apps, and you can't make them into mobile apps without either severely dumbing them down or just creating a different apps.

Like outlook, which is also an email client. I'm sure there's an outlook smartphone app, haven't used it, but it's certainly a completely different UI and application.

I can usually spot mobile first design from a mile away. Because the app looks stupid on desktop and sort of feels like a toy. Huge buttons, enormous white space, menus for no reason.

Tried it myself, first three I got were also about AI.

Curious if there are any statistics on which topics people are writing about.

Click the Topics button.

How did I miss topics button!? It makes the whole experience absolutely different.