Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | behehebd's commentslogin

People fetishizing costs. It is like a sales guy saying "I spent $5k on flights this week, aiming for $20k next week" ... "well OK good for you!"


How does it compare to my goto: a test suite that uses Playwright?

> Claude imolement plan.md until all unit and browser tests pass


I assume that this is dependent on app, and it's quite possible that your approach is best in some cases.

In my case I started with something somewhat like Playwright, and claude had a habit of interacting with the app more directly than a user would be able to and so not spotting problems because of it. Forcing it to interact by pressing keys rather than delving into the dom or executing random javascript helped. In particular I wanted to be able to chat with it as it tried things interactively. This is more to help with manual tests or exploratory testing rather than classic automated testing.

My current app is a desktop app, so playwright isn't as applicable.


AI creates the stag

This creates the flation


Your comment was technically true but I don't get the point of it.


But that isn't even the issue. Drone attack on the plant that produces it. So even with the input materials. No dice for now.


That's only one part of it. Even if the plant isn't attacked, they're not gonna be pumping gas when storage is full and LNG can't be shipped out.


What helium?


Or 12 / 7 > 1 so most maybe all years will have a F13


You can therefore stick a sim in a dumb phone. And still jave a desktop smartphone for any bank or service that demands an app.

By using a monitor you psychologically change the device from a time sink to a tool.


i was more trying to figure put what the mention of a specific smartphone brand brought to the table

it didn't add anything to the (interesting) parent post


As invisible as radio signals then.


In general, it is very easy to detect that radio signals are present.

A better comparison is with radio signals for which a method of spread-spectrum modulation has been used, chosen such as to have a bandwidth so wide that the averaged signal falls below the thermal noise level.

Such radio signals will also not be detectable without special detectors.

WiFi and Bluetooth use spread-spectrum modulation methods but they have relatively low bandwidths, so they can be easily distinguished from thermal noise. Much wider bandwidths are required to prevent detection.


Now now... Let's be fair...

Radio broadcasts to everyone.

Light you can block off to a single direction.

Oh wait, directional radio antennas exist. Nevermind, yes. Exactly like radio waves.


> Light you can block off in a single direction.

Sorta, kinda. You're really only just attenuating things a lot. It's tricky to actually block it off fully.

Same with radio waves, as light is literally the same phenomena as radio waves, it's just shaking faster.


Almost like its all electromagnetic waves


I thought this was going to be some kind of wifi or bluetooth mesh


Me too, or some kind of offline caching system that automatically downloads your commonly visited websites or something


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: