Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | apopapo's commentslogin

It's not only the united states of America. These tyrannical views have been brewing everywhere for years, and there was not enough public counter-narrative to these ideologies.

Sadly it's not only the UK. There is a global push to restrict communication world-wide. The future is very bleak for fundamental freedoms.

I’m not convinced anymore that we can handle freedom. Many children grow up glued to a phone or tablet watching AI videos and are targets of dis-information from foreign and/or hostile actors.

If "dis-information" is the core of the issue, then perhaps we ought to start banning religions? Despite doing that, China is a champion of spreading "dis-information" within their own walls. Hostile actors are not foreign, most often they are domestic. The biggest offenders are governments. Only freedom opposes their power, which is why they want to restrict it.

We can't handle unchecked pursuit of profit, freedom isn't the issue.

The people who want unchecked pursuit of profit simply beat you to the punch by manipulating the social zeitgeist to accept that the unchecked pursuit of profit is the very definition of freedom.

It is a cynical view of humanity, but one that seems most correct.

If for example there is a deadly virus going around people will quickly restrict freedoms to prevent its spread. And even in the case they don't people that believe in freedom over precautions are evolutionary culled.

So what happens when the issue is actually infohazards? One of the common assumptions the freedom group makes is with all the information they have, anyone else would come to the same set of decisions they have. Of course I see two problems with this.

1. The freedom group is quite often hypocritical. That is, freedom is defined however they think, and anything outside of how they thing is "Not true freedom™". Elon Musk is a common source of this kind of freedom.

2. The individuals personal definition of freedom is anecdotal (We'll call this set A). Set A individual thinks by telling another individual with set B ideas on freedom that set A will win somehow? (A + B = A). That when you put ideas out there, by some magic process the best ideas win and take over and everything is happily ever after.

Of course where number 2 commonly fails is if an infohazard is more addictive than actual knowledge, and where the inoculation to said addiction takes a long time to reach herd immunity. And example would be that it's faster to destroy a nation due to ragebait faster than open democracy can adjust, hence democracy always fails in these conditions. Nice catch-22 situation.


Meh it’s accessing and posting stuff on the internet, not that big of a deal. I’d like to see a much bigger humdrum around the ubiquitous surveillance cameras that will eventually be fed to some sort of LLM to create an omniscient eye that follows everyone everywhere.

Taxpayers' money used to track taxpayers and finance the advertising industry.

It makes us dumber and dumber.

The Cleveland Clinic would say you are right [0]

> Headaches.

> Persistent tiredness or sluggishness during the day.

> Disorientation.

> Confusion or altered mental state.

> Paranoia.

> Depression.

> Seizures.

No word from the Cincinnati Clinic though...

[0] https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24808-hyperca...


Thanks for sharing. Can you share an estimate of how many tokens it uses over time? Would love to know how much it costs in terms of money.


It all depends on the model and how much you use it of course. We're running Opus 4.6 and on a light day it spends a dollar or two. This is just a few simple operations like "create a ticket for ..." and it's regular heartbeat checks. The heaviest day I see is $110 and on that day we were basically talking to it and having it implement features all day long.


That does not mean everybody systematically is "hurt" like you were. That is a very dangerous extrapolation.


Of course not everybody is systematically hurt nor did I claim that. About 11% of porn users are addicts. Porn addiction is real and incredibly difficult. But even when you are not addicted, regular porn usage has negative effects on mental health (lower impulse control, higher rates of depression and anxiety). It stands to reason that this effect would be exaggerated in children and teenagers.

At best, pornography is akin to alcohol and cigarettes. We regulate the ability of minors to access these things for obvious reasons. I see no reason why internet pornography is different.


Has anyone managed to run Matrix over I2P or other similar overlay network technologies?


Apparently yes [0]. I thought I'd seen a different post the other day, but this one was further up in a ddg search

[0] https://tomsitcafe.com/2025/11/06/private-matrix-hosting-a-s...


Why would Slack not be affected by the same stupid laws?


If you're a Slack user, I don't think they need your ID to tell that you're an adult

More seriously, it will become a problem on there is a significant user migration to there and a repeat of the mass hysteria. Due to being more niche, these smaller platforms are probably not in danger right now.


All these players will never dethrone DeadBeeF's interface. Foobar2000 simply has the perfect layout - and it's customizable.


> psc uses eBPF iterators to read process and file descriptor information directly from kernel data structures. This bypasses the /proc filesystem entirely, providing visibility that cannot be subverted by userland rootkits or LD_PRELOAD tricks.

Is there a trade off here?


I found this justification dubious. To me the main reason to use eBPF is that it gives more information and is lower overhead.


It requires root


Running eBPF programs doesn't strictly require root.


It requires cap_bpf which is considered a high privileged capability.

So yes, it requires root in the sense of what people mean by root.


You can also enable unpriviledged ebpf.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: