I think you are 2-4 orders of magnitude off if you think donation could be enough for a project as important as Android where 1 day delay in fixing security issue is just disasterous.

> where 1 day delay in fixing security issue is just disasterous.

looking at the current reality of patches is that you are lucky if there is a patch next month

> But if a Brit comes to your country and buys cocaine from you, in person, you wouldn't expect to be convicted as a dealer in the UK.

No? All countries catch drug dealers from other countries all the time even for the crime that happened outside of their borders. Or do you really think El Chapo could vacation freely in Europe.

El Chapo was extradited and convicted for crimes actively committed in Mexico, then the US in relation to managing a multinational drug cartel. Murder, money laundering, more murder, smuggling, yet more murder, etc etc etc.

This seems significantly different to openly and honestly posting narcotics.

Even something as simple as docker pull fails for 0.02% of the time.

> Anyway, this isn’t the Olympics, a professional sport, or Chess.

Yes, its prize pool is order of magnitude higher than either of Olympics sports or Chess.

I’m sure there’s a game out there that has a prize pool for matchmaking mode, because any silly thing has happened somewhere, but I’d expect that sort of thing to mostly be handled in proper tournaments.

It's not so much tournaments but viewership. People watch others play on Twitch, that gets you money directly as well as sponsorships. This incentives people to cheat so they're good on stream.

It is a lot harder to cheat on a live stream though.

spending your productive output making one of the most powerful terrible people alive more powerful just sounds depressing to me. do you really want your research to be how to make the personality of Elon's anti woke mind virus LLM better at erotic talk.

I guess it comes down to your daily efforts serving only to make the world a worst place, vs having a neutral job

Allowing it to users who ask for erotic talk is in my opinion way better than forcing someone to watch shady ads based on private conversations.

For compute bound region(high batch size) yes, but for low batch size it could improve the throughput.

> Trying to go straight for the goal is risky.

That's the point of it. You need to take more risk for different approach. Same as what OpenAI did initially.

> we didn't see anything.

Is it a troll? Even if we just ignore Llama, Meta invented and released so many foundational research and open source code. I would say that the computer vision field would be years behind if Meta didn't publish some core research like DETR or MAE.

You should ignore Llama because by his own admission,

>My only contribution was to push for Llama 2 to be open sourced.

He founded the team that worked on fasttext, llama and other similarly impactful projects.

Did he work on those vision models?

Heart rate is very correlated with health. So at the very least they can (illegally?) filter out unhealthy candidates.

It's probably not great for this. Resting heart rate is correlated with fitness, but candidates can be nervous during interviews which can drastically change their heart rate. You'd probably be able to make better guesses about their health through looking at them (do they look sickly or overweight?) and interviewing them.

It's also not a specific enough signal for the types of health conditions that require taking time off work. Assuming they could get an accurate resting heart rate, most of the time it'll just indicate whether the candidate does a lot of exercise.

You are talking about healthy and borderline. I am talking about unhealthy. If someone has heart rate of say 150 they are far more likely to have other issues.

If someone has heart rate of 150 during an interview, it's most likely anxiety.