Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DavidCanHelp's commentslogin

After you try the WASM, don't forget to try the native version: `cargo install unit`

Thanks! It's been a fun project to build. The live demo only scratches the surface — the native CLI (cargo install unit) does real UDP mesh networking, persistence, and cross-machine coordination. More coming soon.

There's a live demo in the browser: https://davidliedle.github.io/WISP/


There's a companion project (that actually inspired this) that implements it so you can see it in action: https://github.com/devrelopers/repo-mood


Built this yesterday as a quick tool to solve a problem I've seen since 2017 — Slack exports are essentially unreadable JSON blobs with no good way to browse them.

SlArchive processes everything client-side in the browser using JSZip. Your export never touches a server. Drop the ZIP, browse channels, DMs, and threads, search across everything, then export to HTML, Markdown, or JSON if you need to migrate to another platform.

It's a single HTML file, MIT licensed, source at https://github.com/devrelopers/slarchive. Contributions welcome.


Full title: Your Tools Are Lying to You


https://crates.io/crates/ratatui-form is the crate. The docs are at https://docs.rs/ratatui-form

Source: https://github.com/DavidLiedle/ratatui-form

I originally named this project tform, but that was taken so the URL has been updated.


More context: haters are saying LLM generated content is bad. As a Senior Full Stack Developer with over 26 years of pro experience, I'm having the time of my life with these new AI powers and the doors and discussions they open. People are upvoting. I'm personally not getting anything from this open source sharing. You're the one calling spam. When you pay 200 a month to max your claude code output and really hunker down, think twice before you share its work. Not everyone understands.


It is absurd to pay $200 a month for it when GitHub Copilot has agentic development basically for free for open source developers, including GPT/Claude/Gemini models. If you want to waste your own money, fine, but don't expect others to waste a single dollar of their money when decent options are available at no cost.

Especially Claude is well known for wasting output tokens, for maximizing output token use when fewer tokens would do just fine, although other models too have picked up this disease as of late.

Yes, better models could produce better output, especially for a large project, but in my experience, the quality of the output depends 10x more on the clarity and refinement of the input. In the real world, the bulk of engineering is incremental, not one-shot.

Also, when I see a large repo with just three commits made all at once, it tells me that the vibe-coded output hasn't really been reviewed or refined over time, that it has not withstood the test of time at all, it hasn't received the love and attention it needs to make it mature, and so it cannot be trusted in this stage of its development.


wait what??? github copilot is free??? is that only free trial?


Its Pro plan is not free for everyone, but it is free for verified students, teachers, and maintainers of popular established open source projects. See https://github.com/features/copilot/plans . I clearly noted in my parent comment the constraint of open source developers. It's not a trial. If you get approved, you get re-evaluated each month.


> LLM-written book about Lisp.

I don't really care if you're an astronaut, time traveler, or a 15 year old. AI slop prompted by anyone is slop, and I'm a human with limited time which I'd rather not waste on slop


This comment itself reads like AI slop.


My first one even captured the banter with the LLM: https://github.com/cloudstreet-dev/React-is-Awful/blob/main/...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: